Eficacia y seguridad del uso de novo y precoz de tacrolimus de liberación prolongada en el trasplante cardiaco / Efficacy and safety of de novo and early use of extended-release tacrolimus in heart transplantation

Introducción y objetivos: El tacrolimus de liberación prolongada (TLP) permite una dosificación única diaria, lo que simplifica el régimen inmunosupresor. El presente estudio describe la eficacia y la seguridad del uso de TLP de novo y precoz para el trasplante cardiaco. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional, retrospectivo y multicéntrico para comparar el uso de novode TLP (grupo de TLP; n = 94), tacrolimus de liberación estándar (grupo de TLE; n = 42) y la conversión precoz (CP) de TLP a TLE (grupo de CP; n = 44). El TLP se usó entre 2007 y 2012. Se analizaron la tasa de incidencia de rechazo agudo, infección e infección por citomegalovirus al primer año tras el trasplante, así como parámetros de seguridad. Resultados: Entre los grupos no hubo diferencias significativas en la dosis diaria y las concentraciones séricas de tacrolimus durante el primer año tras el trasplante. La incidencia de rechazo fue de 1,05 (IC95%, 0,51-1,54), 1,39 (IC95%, 1,00-1,78) y 1,11 (IC95%, 0,58-1,65) eventos/pacientes-años en los grupos de TLE, TLP y CP respectivamente (p = 0,48). La incidencia de infección fue de 0,75 (IC95%, 0,60-0,86), 0,62 (IC95%, 0,52-0,71) y 0,55 (IC95%, 0,40-0,68) en los grupos de TLE, TLP y CP respectivamente (p = 0,46). Se produjo infección por citomegalovirus en el 23,8, el 20,2 y el 18,2% respectivamente (p = 0,86). No hubo diferencias significativas entre los grupos en los parámetros de seguridad o la función del injerto. Falleció 1 paciente del grupo de TLE y 2 del grupo de TLP. Conclusiones: Parece que el uso de novo de TLP o la CP de TLP a TLE tienen similares eficacia y seguridad que el TLE en el trasplante cardiaco (AU)

Introduction and objectives: The extended-release formulation of tacrolimus (ERT) allows once-daily dosage, thus simplifying the immunosuppressive regimen. This study aimed to describe the safety and efficacy of the de novo and early use of ERT in heart transplantation. Methods: This was an observational, retrospective, multicenter study comparing the safety and efficacy of the de novo use of ERT (ERT group [n = 94]), standard-release tacrolimus (SRT group [n = 42]) and early conversion (EC) from SRT to ERT (EC group [n = 44]). Extended-release tacrolimus was used between 2007 and 2012. One-year incidence rates of acute rejection, infection, and cytomegalovirus infection were analyzed. Safety parameters were also evaluated. Results: There were no significant between-group differences in the daily dose or trough levels of tacrolimus during the first year after transplantation. The rejection incidence rates were 1.05 (95%CI, 0.51-1.54), 1.39 (95%CI, 1.00-1.78), and 1.11 (95%CI, 0.58-1.65) episodes per patient-years in the SRT group, ERT group, and EC group, respectively (P = .48). The infection incidence rates were 0.75 (95%CI, 0.60-0.86), 0.62 (95%CI, 0.52-0.71), and 0.55 (95%CI, 0.40-0.68) in the SRT group, ERT group, and EC group, respectively (P = .46). Cytomegalovirus infection occurred in 23.8%, 20.2%, and 18.2% of the patients, respectively (P = .86). No significant between-group differences were found in laboratory tests or in allograft function. There was 1 death in the SRT group and 2 in the ERT group. Conclusions: Both de novo and early use of ERT seem to have similar safety and efficacy profiles to conventional SRT-based immunosuppression (AU)

Efficacy and Safety of de Novo and Early Use of Extended-release Tacrolimus in Heart Transplantation.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The extended-release formulation of tacrolimus (ERT) allows once-daily dosage, thus simplifying the immunosuppressive regimen. This study aimed to describe the safety and efficacy of the de novo and early use of ERT in heart transplantation. METHODS: This was an observational, retrospective, multicenter study comparing the safety and efficacy of the de novo use of ERT (ERT group [n=94]), standard-release tacrolimus (SRT group [n=42]) and early conversion (EC) from SRT to ERT (EC group [n=44]). Extended-release tacrolimus was used between 2007 and 2012. One-year incidence rates of acute rejection, infection, and cytomegalovirus infection were analyzed. Safety parameters were also evaluated. RESULTS: There were no significant between-group differences in the daily dose or trough levels of tacrolimus during the first year after transplantation. The rejection incidence rates were 1.05 (95%CI, 0.51-1.54), 1.39 (95%CI, 1.00-1.78), and 1.11 (95%CI, 0.58-1.65) episodes per patient-years in the SRT group, ERT group, and EC group, respectively (P=.48). The infection incidence rates were 0.75 (95%CI, 0.60-0.86), 0.62 (95%CI, 0.52-0.71), and 0.55 (95%CI, 0.40-0.68) in the SRT group, ERT group, and EC group, respectively (P=.46). Cytomegalovirus infection occurred in 23.8%, 20.2%, and 18.2% of the patients, respectively (P=.86). No significant between-group differences were found in laboratory tests or in allograft function. There was 1 death in the SRT group and 2 in the ERT group. CONCLUSIONS: Both de novo and early use of ERT seem to have similar safety and efficacy profiles to conventional SRT-based immunosuppression.

CMV-specific T-cell immunity in solid organ transplant recipients at low risk of CMV infection. Chronology and applicability in preemptive therapy.

OBJECTIVES: To characterize whether the CMV-specific cellular immune response can be used as a predictor of the control of CMV infection and disease and determine thresholds in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients seropositive for CMV (R+). METHODS: The CMV-specific T-cell response was characterized using intracellular cytokine staining and the evolution of clinical and virological parameters were recorded during the first year after transplantation. RESULTS: Besides having positive CMV serology, only 28.4% patients had positive immunity (CD8+CD69+IFN-γ+ ≥0.25%) at 2 weeks after transplantation. These patients had less indication of preemptive treatment (p = 0.025) and developed less high grade (≥2000 IU/ml) CMV replication episodes (p = 0.006) than patients with no immunity. Of the 49 patients with a pretransplant sample, only 22.4% had positive immunity, and had a detectable immune response early after transplantation (median of 3.7 weeks). However, only 50% of patients with negative pretransplant immunity acquired a positive immune response and it was significantly later, at a median of 11 weeks (p < 0.001). Patients that developed CMV disease had no CMV-specific immunity. CONCLUSIONS: Having CMV-specific CD8+IFN-γ+ cells ≥0.25% before transplant; 0.15% at two weeks or 0.25% at four weeks after transplantation, identifies patients that may spontaneously control CMV infection and may require less monitoring.

Registro Español de Trasplante Cardiaco. XXVI Informe Oficial de la Sección de Insuficiencia Cardiaca y Trasplante Cardiaco de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología (1984-2014) / Spanish Heart Transplantation Registry. 26th Official Report of the Spanish Society of Cardiology Working Group on Heart Failure and Heart Transplantation (1984-2014)

Introducción y objetivos. Se presentan las características y resultados del trasplante cardiaco en España desde que empezó su actividad en mayo de 1984. Métodos. Se realiza un análisis descriptivo de las características de los receptores, los donantes, el procedimiento quirúrgico y los resultados de los trasplantes cardiacos realizados en España hasta el 31 de diciembre de 2014. Resultados. Durante 2014 se han realizado 266 procedimientos, con lo que la serie histórica consta de 7.289 trasplantes. El análisis temporal confirma un empeoramiento significativo del perfil clínico de los receptores (mayor porcentaje de pacientes añosos, con insuficiencia renal grave, diabetes insulinodependiente, cirugía cardiaca previa y ventilación mecánica), de los donantes (mayor porcentaje de donantes añosos y con mayor discordancia de peso) y del procedimiento (mayor porcentaje de trasplante urgente, que en 2014 alcanza el 41,4%, y con tiempo de isquemia > 240 min). El uso de dispositivos de asistencia mecánica ha disminuido respecto a 2013, y en 2014 supone el 18,8% del total de pacientes. La supervivencia a 1, 5, 10 y 15 años es del 76, el 65, el 52 y el 38% respectivamente, y permanece estable desde 1995. Conclusiones. La actividad de trasplante cardiaco en España permanece estable en los últimos años, con alrededor de 250 procedimientos al año. A pesar del claro empeoramiento de las características de donantes, receptores y tiempos quirúrgicos, se mantienen unos resultados en mortalidad comparables a los del entorno y se confirma un uso creciente de los dispositivos de asistencia circulatoria antes del trasplante (AU)

Introduction and objectives. We present the characteristics and outcomes of heart transplantation in Spain since it was first performed in 1984. Methods. A descriptive analysis of the characteristics of recipients, donors, the surgical procedure, and the outcomes of heart transplantations performed in Spain until 31 December 2014. Results. In 2014, 266 procedures were performed, making a time series of 7289 transplantations. The temporal analysis confirmed a significant worsening of the clinical profile of recipients (higher percentage of older patients, patients with severe renal failure, insulin-dependent diabetes, previous cardiac surgery, and previous mechanical ventilation), of donors (higher percentage of older donors and greater weight mismatch), and of the procedure (higher percentage of emergency transplantations, reaching 41.4% in 2014, and ischemia time > 240 min). Mechanical assist devices were used less than in 2013; in 2014 they were used in 18.8% of all transplant recipients. Survival at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years was 76%, 65%, 52%, and 38%, respectively, and has remained stable since 1995. Conclusions. Cardiac transplantation activity in Spain has remained stable in recent years, at around 250 procedures per year. Despite a clear deterioration in donor and recipient characteristics and surgical times, the mortality outcomes have remained comparable to those of previous periods in our environment. The growing use of circulatory assist devices before transplantation is also confirmed (AU)

Spanish Heart Transplantation Registry. 26th Official Report of the Spanish Society of Cardiology Working Group on Heart Failure and Heart Transplantation (1984-2014).

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: We present the characteristics and outcomes of heart transplantation in Spain since it was first performed in 1984. METHODS: A descriptive analysis of the characteristics of recipients, donors, the surgical procedure, and the outcomes of heart transplantations performed in Spain until 31 December 2014. RESULTS: In 2014, 266 procedures were performed, making a time series of 7289 transplantations. The temporal analysis confirmed a significant worsening of the clinical profile of recipients (higher percentage of older patients, patients with severe renal failure, insulin-dependent diabetes, previous cardiac surgery, and previous mechanical ventilation), of donors (higher percentage of older donors and greater weight mismatch), and of the procedure (higher percentage of emergency transplantations, reaching 41.4% in 2014, and ischemia time>240min). Mechanical assist devices were used less than in 2013; in 2014 they were used in 18.8% of all transplant recipients. Survival at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years was 76%, 65%, 52%, and 38%, respectively, and has remained stable since 1995. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac transplantation activity in Spain has remained stable in recent years, at around 250 procedures per year. Despite a clear deterioration in donor and recipient characteristics and surgical times, the mortality outcomes have remained comparable to those of previous periods in our environment. The growing use of circulatory assist devices before transplantation is also confirmed.

Donor/recipient sex mismatch and survival after heart transplantation: only an issue in male recipients? An analysis of the Spanish Heart Transplantation Registry.

The results of studies on the association between sex mismatch and survival after heart transplantation are conflicting. Data from the Spanish Heart Transplantation Registry. From 4625 recipients, 3707 (80%) were men. The donor was female in 943 male recipients (25%) and male in 481 female recipients (52%). Recipients of male hearts had a higher body mass index (25.9 ± 4.1 vs. 24.3 ± 3.7; P < 0.01), and male donors were younger than female donors (33.4 ± 12.7 vs. 38.2 ± 12.3; P < 0.01). No further relevant differences related to donor sex were detected. In the univariate analysis, mismatch was associated with mortality in men (hazard ratio [HR], 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.32; P = 0.003) but not in women (HR, 0.91; 95% CI 0.74-1.12; P = 0.4). A significant interaction was detected between sex mismatch and recipient gender (P = 0.02). In the multivariate analysis, sex mismatch was associated with long-term mortality (HR, 1.14; 95% CI 1.01-1.29; P = 0.04), and there was a tendency toward significance for the interaction between sex mismatch and recipient gender (P = 0.08). In male recipients, mismatch increased mortality mainly during the first month and in patients with pulmonary gradient >13 mmHg. Sex mismatch seems to be associated with mortality after heart transplantation in men but not in women.

Twelve-month efficacy and safety of the conversion to everolimus in maintenance heart transplant recipients.

AIM: To determine the clinical reasons for conversion to everolimus (EVL) and long-term outcomes in heart transplant (HT) recipients. METHODS: A retrospective 12-mo study has been carried out in 14 Spanish centres to assess the efficacy and safety of conversion to EVL in maintenance HT recipients. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-two patients were included (mean age: 53 ± 10.5 years; mean time from HT: 8.1 ± 4.5 years). The most common reasons for conversion were nephrotoxicity (30%), chronic allograft vasculopathy (20%) and neoplasms (17%). The doses and mean levels of EVL at baseline (conversion to EVL) and after one year were 1.3 ± 0.3 and 1.2 ± 0.6 mg/d and 6.4 ± 3.4 and 5.6 ± 2.5 ng/mL, respectively. The percentage of patients receiving calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) at baseline and on the final visit was 95% and 65%, respectively. The doses and mean levels of CNIs decreased between baseline and month 12 from 142.2 ± 51.6 to 98.0 ± 39.4 mg/d (P < 0.001) and from 126.1 ± 50.9 to 89.2 ± 47.7 ng/mL (P < 0.001), respectively, for cyclosporine, and from 2.9 ± 1.8 to 2.6 ± 1.9 mg/d and from 8.3 ± 4.0 to 6.5 ± 2.7 ng/mL (P = 0.011) for tacrolimus. In the subgroup of patients converted because of nephrotoxicity, creatinine clearance increased from 34.9 ± 10.1 to 40.4 ± 14.4 mL/min (P < 0.001). There were 37 episodes of acute rejection in 24 patients (11%). The most frequent adverse events were oedemas (12%), infections (9%) and gastrointestinal problems (6%). EVL was suspended in 44 patients (20%). Since the database was closed at the end of the study, no further follow-up data is available. CONCLUSION: Conversion to EVL in maintenance HT recipients allowed minimisation or suspension of the CNIs, with improved kidney function in the patients with nephrotoxicity, after 12 mo.

Spanish Heart Transplantation Registry. 25th official report of the Spanish Society of Cardiology Working Group on Heart Failure and Heart Transplantation (1984-2013).

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The present article reports the characteristics and outcome of heart transplantation in Spain since it was first performed in May 1984. METHODS: We provide a descriptive analysis of the characteristics of the recipients, the donors, the surgical procedure, and results of the heart transplantations performed in Spain until 31 December 2013. RESULTS: During 2013, a total of 248 transplantation procedures were carried out, bringing the time series to a total of 7023 transplantations. The temporal analysis confirms a significant deterioration in the clinical profile of the recipients (higher percentage of older patients, severe renal failure, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, previous heart surgery, mechanical ventilation), of the donors (higher proportion of older donors and greater weight mismatch), and of the procedure (higher percentage of emergency transplantations which, in 2013, reached 49%, and with ischemia times > 240min). There was a marked increase in the use of circulatory assist devices prior to transplantation which, in 2013, were employed in 25.2% of all the patients. The survivals at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years were 76%, 65%, 52%, and 37%, respectively, and have remained stable since 1995. CONCLUSIONS: Heart transplantation activity in Spain remains stable in recent years, with around 250 procedures a year. Despite the clear deterioration in the clinical characteristics of the donors and recipients, and lengthening of the operative times, the results in terms of mortality continue to be comparable to those reported in our neighboring countries, and a growing use of circulatory assist devices prior to transplantation is confirmed.

Registro Español de Trasplante Cardiaco. XXV Informe Oficial de la Sección de Insuficiencia Cardiaca y Trasplante Cardiaco de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología (1984-2013) / Spanish Heart Transplantation Registry. 25th Official Report of the Spanish Society of Cardiology Working Group on Heart Failure and Heart Transplantation (1984-2013)

Introducción y objetivos. El presente artículo presenta las características y resultados del trasplante cardiaco en España desde que empezó su actividad en mayo de 1984. Métodos. Se realiza un análisis descriptivo de las características de los receptores, los donantes, el procedimiento quirúrgico y los resultados de los trasplantes cardiacos realizados en España hasta el 31 de diciembre de 2013. Resultados. Durante 2013 se han realizado 248 procedimientos, con lo que la serie histórica consta de 7.023 trasplantes. El análisis temporal confirma un empeoramiento significativo del perfil clínico de los receptores (mayor porcentaje de pacientes añosos, insuficiencia renal grave, diabetes mellitus insulinodependiente, cirugía cardiaca previa, ventilación mecánica), los donantes (mayor porcentaje de donantes añosos y mayor discordancia de peso) y el procedimiento (mayor porcentaje de trasplante urgente, que en 2013 alcanzó el 49%, y con tiempos de isquemia > 240 min). Hay un incremento notable del uso previo al trasplante de dispositivos de asistencia circulatoria, que en 2013 ha llegado al 25,2% del total de pacientes. Las supervivencias a 1, 5, 10 y 15 años son del 76, el 65, el 52 y el 37% respectivamente, y permanecen estables desde 1995. Conclusiones. La actividad de trasplante cardiaco en España permanece estable en los últimos años, con alrededor de 250 procedimientos al año. A pesar del claro empeoramiento en las características de los donantes, los receptores y los tiempos quirúrgicos, se mantienen unos resultados de mortalidad comparables a los de los países vecinos y se confirma un uso creciente de los dispositivos de asistencia circulatoria antes del trasplante (AU)

Introduction and objectives. The present article reports the characteristics and outcome of heart transplantation in Spain since it was first performed in May 1984. Methods. We provide a descriptive analysis of the characteristics of the recipients, the donors, the surgical procedure, and results of the heart transplantations performed in Spain until 31 December 2013. Results. During 2013, a total of 248 transplantation procedures were carried out, bringing the time series to a total of 7023 transplantations. The temporal analysis confirms a significant deterioration in the clinical profile of the recipients (higher percentage of older patients, severe renal failure, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, previous heart surgery, mechanical ventilation), of the donors (higher proportion of older donors and greater weight mismatch), and of the procedure (higher percentage of emergency transplantations which, in 2013, reached 49%, and with ischemia times > 240 min). There was a marked increase in the use of circulatory assist devices prior to transplantation which, in 2013, were employed in 25.2% of all the patients. The survivals at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years were 76%, 65%, 52%, and 37%, respectively, and have remained stable since 1995. Conclusions. Heart transplantation activity in Spain remains stable in recent years, with around 250 procedures a year. Despite the clear deterioration in the clinical characteristics of the donors and recipients, and lengthening of the operative times, the results in terms of mortality continue to be comparable to those reported in our neighboring countries, and a growing use of circulatory assist devices prior to transplantation is confirmed (AU)

Clinical impact of neutropenia related with the preemptive therapy of CMV infection in solid organ transplant recipients.

OBJECTIVES: The most frequent adverse events associated with valganciclovir treatment are hematological disturbances such as neutropenia. However, the consequences of neutropenia are unknown. We investigated the clinical impact of neutropenia during CMV preemptive therapy and its relationship with the length of antiviral therapy. METHODS: An observational, prospective cohort of 67 solid organ transplant recipients receiving CMV preemptive therapy was studied. RESULTS: Severe neutropenia occurred in 21.8% of the patients at a median of three weeks after initiating antiviral therapy. No association was observed between neutropenia and infection risk in these patients. Liver transplant recipients had 6.7 fold increased risk of neutropenia during CMV therapy compared to kidney transplant recipients (p = 0.012). Patients who developed severe neutropenia received antiviral therapy a median of six days longer than patient who did not (p = 0.457). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the frequency of neutropenia during CMV preemptive therapy, the incidence of infections is not increased. Adjusting the length of preemptive therapy during the episodes of viremia may be recommended, especially in patients with concurrent risk factors for neutropenia such as liver recipients. Further trials are warranted to confirm the safety of this approach.

Spanish Heart Transplantation Registry. 24th official report of the Spanish Society of Cardiology Working Group on Heart Failure and Heart Transplantation (1984-2012).

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The present article reports the characteristics and results of heart transplantation in Spain since this therapeutic modality was first used in May 1984. METHODS: We summarize the main features of recipients, donors, and surgical procedures, as well as the results of all heart transplantations performed in Spain until December 31, 2012. RESULTS: A total of 247 heart transplantations were performed in 2012. The whole series consisted of 6775 procedures. Recent years have seen a progressive worsening in the clinical characteristics of recipients (34% aged over 60 years, 22% with severe kidney failure, 17% with insulin-dependent diabetes, 29% with previous heart surgery, 16% under mechanical ventilation) and donors (38% aged over 45 years, 26% with recipient: donor weight mismatch>20%), and in surgical conditions (29% of procedures at >4 h ischemia and 36% as emergency transplantations). The probability of survival at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years of follow-up was 78%, 67%, 53%, and 38%, respectively. These results have remained stable since 1995. CONCLUSIONS: In recent years, the number of heart transplantations/year in Spain has remained stable at around 250. Despite the worsening of recipient and donor clinical characteristics and of time-to-surgery, the results in terms of mortality have remained stable and compare favorably with those of other countries.

Transplantation for complex congenital heart disease in adults: a subanalysis of the Spanish Heart Transplant Registry.

BACKGROUND: Congenital heart diseases (CHDs) have high infant mortality in their severe forms. When adulthood is reached, a heart transplant (HTx) may be required. Spanish adult population transplanted for CHD was analyzed and compared with the most frequent causes of HTx and between different subgroups of CHD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 6048 patients (HTx 1984-2009) were included. Pediatric transplants (<15 yr), combined transplants, reHTx, and HTx for heart diseases other than idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDCM) and ischemic heart disease (IHD) were excluded. Total patients included: 3166 (IHD = 1888; IDCM = 1223; CHD = 55). Subgroups were studied as follows: (1) single ventricle with pulmonary stenosis (n = 18), (2) single ventricle with tricuspid atresia and Glenn/Fontan surgery (n = 10), (3) congenitally corrected transposition of the great vessels (TGV) or with switch atrial surgery (n = 10), and (4) CHD with right ventricle overload (n = 17). RESULTS: Survival probability was different between groups (p = 0.0001). Post hoc analysis showed some differences between groups (CHD vs. IHD, p = 0.05; CHD vs. IDCM, p = 0.5; IHD vs. IDCM, p = 0.0001). Early mortality was different between CHD subgroups (group 1 = 19%, group 2 = 40%, group 3 = 0%, group 4 = 29%; p < 0.001); however, overall mortality did not show differences between subgroups (p = 0.5). CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of Spanish adult HTx patients for CHD is low (1%). The survival curve is better than for other HTx causes (IHD). Nevertheless, early mortality was higher, particularly in some subgroups (Fontan).

Deficient long-term response to pandemic vaccine results in an insufficient antibody response to seasonal influenza vaccination in solid organ transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the long-term antibody response to the 2009-H1N1 vaccine in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR) and its clinical repercussion on the efficacy of following 2010-2011 influenza vaccine. METHODS: We performed a multicenter prospective study in SOTR receiving one dose of the nonadjuvant 2010-2011 seasonal influenza vaccine and determined the immunological response at 5 weeks after vaccination. RESULTS: One hundred SOTR were included. Long-term antibody titers to the previous vaccine were only detected in one third of the patients. Patients with baseline titers had significantly higher seroprotection for the 2009-H1N1 strain (100% vs. 73%, relative risks [RR] 1.37, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.19-1.57; P=0.006), for H3N2 strain (100% vs. 62.2%, RR 1.61, 95% CI 1.36-1.90; P=0.005), and for B strain (100% vs. 69%; P=0.02). The seroconversion rate in patients with baseline titers was 90.9% vs. 73% (RR 2.97, 95% CI 0.75-11.74; P=0.07) for the 2009-H1N1 strain, 92.2% vs. 62.2% (RR 5.29, 95% CI 0.8-35.7; P=0.02) for the H3N2 strain, and 58.3% vs. 69% (P=0.45) for the B strain. CONCLUSIONS: SOTR response to the 2010-2011 influenza vaccine was not optimal. The response was related to baseline titers; however, most of the patients did not exhibit detectable antibodies at vaccination lacking long-term response. New strategies are necessary to improve vaccination efficacy.

Therapeutic effect of the acquisition of cytomegalovirus-specific immune response during preemptive treatment.

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that preemptive therapy against cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after transplantation promotes a CMV-specific immune response. Our objective was to determine whether solid-organ transplant patients at high risk for CMV infection treated preemptively acquire a CMV-specific immune response and whether the acquired immune response confers immunity by controlling subsequent CMV replication episodes and by protecting from late-onset CMV disease. METHODS: Patients were followed up for 18 months after transplantation. CMV viral load was determined using real-time polymerase chain reaction assays, and the T-cell immune response was characterized by intracellular cytokine staining. RESULTS: The 21 patients studied developed CMV replication episodes at a median of 4 weeks (range 2-8 weeks) after transplantation and a CMV-specific T-cell response within a median of 12 weeks (range 10-20 weeks). The decline in the incidence of CMV replication episodes is inversely correlated with the acquisition of the CMV-specific T-cell response (linear regression r=0.781, Pearson correlation=-0.883; P=0.001). There were no CMV replication episodes after week 47 of transplantation. In addition, after acquisition of the immune response, 42 replication episodes were cleared without treatment. The time taken for immune clearance of replication correlated with the peak viral load (P=0.01). No incidence of CMV early or late-onset disease was detected. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that preemptive therapy is a safe and an effective strategy for the control of CMV infection in solid-organ transplant recipients at high risk for CMV infection. This is the first study that reports a therapeutic effect of the acquisition of CMV-specific immune response during preemptive treatment.

Registro Español de Trasplante Cardiaco. XXI Informe Oficial de la Sección de Insuficiencia Cardiaca y Trasplante Cardiaco de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología (1984-2009) / Spanish Heart Transplantation Registry. 21st Official Report of the Spanish Society of Cardiology Working Group on Heart Failure and Heart Transplantation (1984-2009)

Introducción y objetivos. El propósito de este artículo es presentar los resultados del trasplante cardiaco desde que se inició esta modalidad terapéutica en España en mayo de 1984. Métodos. Se ha realizado un análisis descriptivo de todos los trasplantes cardiacos realizados hasta el 31 de diciembre de 2009. Resultados. El número total de trasplantes fue de 6.048. El perfil clínico medio del paciente que se trasplantó en España en 2009 fue el de un varón de 53 años, diagnosticado de cardiopatía isquémica no revascularizable con depresión grave de la función ventricular y situación funcional avanzada, al que se implantó un corazón procedente de un donante fallecido por hemorragia cerebral, con una media de edad de 37 años y un tiempo en lista de espera de 106 días. El tiempo medio de supervivencia se ha incrementado con los años. Así, mientras en el total de la serie la probabilidad de supervivencia tras 1, 5, 10 y 15 años es del 78, el 67, el 53 y el 40% respectivamente, en los últimos 5 años la probabilidad de supervivencia tras 1 y 5 años es del 85 y el 73% respectivamente. La causa más frecuente de fallecimiento es el fallo agudo del injerto (17%), seguido de infección (16%), un combinado de enfermedad vascular del injerto y muerte súbita (14%), tumores (12%) y rechazo agudo (8%). Conclusiones. La supervivencia obtenida en España con el trasplante cardiaco, sobre todo en los últimos años, lo sitúa como el tratamiento de elección para cardiopatías irreversibles en situación funcional avanzada y sin otras opciones médicas o quirúrgicas establecidas (AU)

Introduction and objectives. The purpose of this report is to present the results obtained with heart transplantation in Spain from the first use of this therapeutic modality in May 1984. Methods. A descriptive analysis of all heart transplantations performed up to December 31, 2009 is presented. Results. In total, 6048 transplants were carried out. The typical clinical profile of a Spanish heart transplant patient in 2009 was that of a 53-year-old male who had been diagnosed with nonrevascularizable ischemic heart disease and who had severely impaired ventricular function and a poor functional status. The implanted heart typically came from a donor who had died from a brain hemorrhage (mean age 37 years) and the average time on the waiting list was 106 days. Mean survival time has increased progressively over the years. Whereas for the whole time series, the probability of survival at 1, 5, 10 and 15 years was 78%, 67%, 53% and 40%, respectively, for the past 5 years, the probability of survival at 1 and 5 years was 85% and 73%, respectively. The most frequent cause of death was acute graft failure (17%), followed by infection (16%), the combination of graft vascular disease and sudden death (14%), tumor (12%) and acute rejection (8%). Conclusions. The survival rates obtained in Spain with heart transplantation, especially in recent years, make the procedure the treatment of choice for patients who have irreversible heart failure and a poor functional status and for whom there are few other established medical or surgical options (AU)

Benefit of Neoral C2 monitoring in de novo cardiac transplant recipients receiving basiliximab induction.

BACKGROUND: For cyclosporine (CsA), 2-hr postdose level (C2) is the best single time point predictor of the area under the curve and a critical measure for effective dosing. The therapeutic CsA microemulsion (Neoral) C2 range in de novo heart transplant patients remains to be determined. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of CsA C2 monitoring in de novo heart transplant patients receiving basiliximab induction. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter, randomized study enrolled 87 adult heart transplant recipients stratified according to 4 to 6 hrs posttransplant serum creatinine less than or equal to 170 micromol/L (cohort A) or more than 170 micromol/L (cohort B). Patients in cohort A were randomized into three C2 ranges (A1: "high" n=25, 1600-1800 ng/mL; A2: "intermediate" n=27, 1400-1600 ng/mL; and A3: "low" n=24, 1200-1400 ng/mL). Patients in cohort B were randomized into intermediate (n=5) and low C2 (n=6). Target ranges were progressively lowered after 1 month. Immunosuppression included basiliximab, Neoral, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids. Endpoints were acute rejection and renal function. RESULTS: The incidence of acute rejection at 12 months was 44% in group A1, 41% in group A2, 33% in group A3, and 27% in cohort B. Pretransplant and 12-month creatinine clearance (mL/min) were group A1, 72+/-25 and 64+/-24; group A2, 81+/-32 and 68+/-25; group A3, 91+/-28 and 86+/-26; and cohort B, 62+/-28 and 79+/-37. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that C2 monitoring is safe in de novo heart transplant patients. A low Neoral C2 range in combination with basiliximab induction resulted in preserved renal function without increased risk of acute rejection.

Influence of induction therapy, immunosuppressive regimen and anti-viral prophylaxis on development of lymphomas after heart transplantation: data from the Spanish Post-Heart Transplant Tumour Registry.

BACKGROUND: Lymphoma after heart transplantation (HT) has been associated with induction therapy and herpesvirus infection. It is not known whether anti-viral agents administered immediately after HT can reduce the incidence of lymphoma. METHODS: This study was a retrospective review of 3,393 patients who underwent HT in Spain between 1984 and December 2003. Variables examined included development of lymphoma and, as possible risk factors, recipient gender and age, induction therapies (anti-thymocyte globulin, OKT3 and anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibodies) and anti-viral prophylaxis (acyclovir or ganciclovir). To study the effect of evolving treatment strategy, three HT eras were considered: 1984 to 1995; 1996 to 2000; and 2001 to 2003. RESULTS: Induction therapy was employed in >60% of HTs, and anti-viral prophylaxis in >50%. There were 62 cases of lymphoma (3.1 per 1,000 person-years, 95% confidence interval: 2.4 to 4.0). Univariate analyses showed no influence of gender, age at transplant, HT era, pre-HT smoking or the immunosuppressive maintenance drugs used in the first 3 months post-HT. The induction agent anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) was associated with increased risk of lymphoma, and prophylaxis with acyclovir with decreased risk of lymphoma. Multivariate analyses (controlling for age group, gender, pre-HT smoking and immunosuppression in the first 3 months with mycophenolate mofetil and/or tacrolimus) showed that induction increased the risk of lymphoma if anti-viral prophylaxis was not used (regardless of induction agent and anti-viral agent), but did not increase the risk if anti-viral prophylaxis was used. CONCLUSIONS: Induction therapies with ATG or OKT3 do or do not increase the risk of lymphoma depending on whether anti-viral prophylaxis with acyclovir or ganciclovir is or is not employed, respectively.